Proposal of names for 329 higher rank taxa defined in the Genome Taxonomy Database under two prokaryotic codes


Citation
Chuvochina et al. (2023). FEMS Microbiology Letters
Names (48)
“Paceibacteria” Vampirovibrionaceae Vampirovibrionales Vampirovibrionia Binataceae Binatales Binatia Hydrothermia Hydrothermales Hydrothermaceae Azobacteroidaceae Bipolaricaulales Bipolaricaulaceae Bipolaricaulia Hepatobacteraceae Hepatoplasmataceae Johnevansiaceae Johnevansiales Kapaibacteriaceae Kapaibacteriales Magnetobacteriaceae Methylomirabilaceae Methylomirabilales Methylomirabilia Muiribacteriaceae Muiribacteriales Muiribacteriia Nucleicultricaceae Obscuribacteraceae Promineifilaceae Promineifilales Pseudothioglobaceae Puniceispirillaceae Puniceispirillales Saccharimonadaceae Saccharimonadales Tenderiaceae Tenderiales Thermobaculaceae Thermobaculales Desulforudaceae Methylomirabilota Cloacimonadia Cloacimonadales Cloacimonadaceae Kapaibacteriia “Poriferisulfidales” Leptolyngbyaceae
Subjects
Genetics Microbiology Molecular Biology
Abstract
Abstract The Genome Taxonomy Database (GTDB) is a taxonomic framework that defines prokaryotic taxa as monophyletic groups in concatenated protein reference trees according to systematic criteria. This has resulted in a substantial number of changes to existing classifications (https://gtdb.ecogenomic.org). In the case of union of taxa, GTDB names were applied based on the priority of publication. The division of taxa or change in rank led to the formation of new Latin names above the rank of genus that were only made publicly available via the GTDB website without associated published taxonomic descriptions. This has sometimes led to confusion in the literature and databases. A number of the provisional GTDB names were later published in other studies, while many still lack authorships. To reduce further confusion, here we propose names and descriptions for 329 GTDB-defined prokaryotic taxa, 223 of which are suitable for validation under the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes (ICNP) and 49 under the Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes Described from Sequence Data (SeqCode). For the latter we designated 23 genomes as type material. An additional 57 taxa that do not currently satisfy the validation criteria of either code are proposed as Candidatus.
Authors
Publication date
2023-07-21
DOI
10.1093/femsle/fnad071